I don't understand this "add remote" command very well: can it CREATE a repository on the remote site, or does it merely ATTACH to one that must already be there? I overcame this error by creating it via browser and using "git add remote" at the terminal, but that's clunky and I'd like to do better. At the same time, I want to create a remote repository on, properly connected so that the "push" and "pull" buttons work.Ĭreating the local was easy enough, but "add remote" got me a strange error message, "no match".I want to create a local repository for it, in the directory I'm already using.I have a programming project that has never before had a repository.I hope to see you again in the next post and feel free to leave a comment.I'm a new user of Gitkraken, and there's one piece of the workflow that I can't readily figure out from the documentation: In the links section, you gonna find the Axosoft announcement about the license change. For new users, I leave the alert about that happened to me and I hope it doesn’t take anyone else by surprise. To end this story, I will not say that I will never use GitKraken again, the fact is that I will take this license change as an opportunity to test a new tool that may or may not meet my expectations. At least I didn’t receive any information on the user interface or even via email.įor those who can’t live without GitKraken, which is, in fact, an excellent tool, there is obviously the option of using the commercial version that costs from $ 29.00 dollars a year, around $ 2.5 dollars a month. What disappointed me was the fact that the team responsible for the tool didn’t alert/message the users about that change. Obviously I was using an older version that’s why the feature was still working for me.Īs I said at the beginning of the post, I can’t say that this is “unexpected” because there is a company behind and companies need to profit. ![]() Also, there are some other points which were changed as well. Visiting the Axosoft blog, which is the company behind GitKraken, there is a post clarifying the situation, that is, private repositories will no longer be part of the free application as of version 6.0. The question that remains is, why was there no warning on the interface alerting users about that change?Īnyway, I went to the “GitKraken” website to understand what happened, hoping to find a release note, but right away I found nothing and ended up going to some communities where I finally found something. It doesn’t take a lot of neurons to understand that they took away one of the features that were “free” in one of those updates. The fact is that this weekend, a long time after I was using GitKraken, I came across an alert saying that I could not open my repository because it was private. The reason was pretty simple, in my point of view, GitKraken was more didactic and have a very easy and nice user interface. A simple search on google, returned me several client options and one of them was GitKraken, the option that I chose. ![]() The subject that I will approach in this post today took me by surprise, although I can’t say that it was an unexpected event, in order to better understand it, I need to tell a brief story.Ī bit over 1 year ago I’ve migrated my development environment from Windows (10) to Linux Mint.Īs expected, some tools are not compatible with both operating systems, so I had to look for alternatives to meet my needs.Īmong those needs was a GIT client as I honestly am not a big fan of handling everything by command line.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |